Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Nomad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. While the consensus is to delete, should anyone want to have this userfied so that they can work on it, please contact me PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Urban Nomad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dicdef. Transwiki or delete. UtherSRG (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per WP:NOTDICT and WP:ESSAY. Not even sure it's dictionary material, more like a figure of speech, with a variety of uses. Yakushima (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Whatever this is, it isn't sourced. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]- I am withdrawing my recommendation because the article has changed since the AfD began. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per all the above. WuhWuzDat 18:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep has anyone heard of WP:BEFORE? "Urban nomad" certainly appears to be a label applied to people in some way: e.g.
- Appleby, L; Slagg, N; Desai, PN (1982). "The urban nomad: a psychiatric problem?". Current psychiatric therapies. 21: 253–62. PMID 7160213.
- Sabloff, P. L. W. (2004). "The Wild East: Portrait of an Urban Nomad:The Wild East: Portrait of an Urban Nomad". Visual Anthropology Review. 20: 90. doi:10.1525/var.2004.20.2.90.
- Carolyn Ellis; Arthur P. Bochner (1996). Composing ethnography: alternative forms of qualitative writing. Rowman Altamira. pp. 176–. ISBN 9780761991649. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
- [1] [2] etc.
- These certainly aren't what the article is about and I can't access the first two sources, but with a little work, I'm sure we could write something about this. SmartSE (talk) 23:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.